Evaluating the Efficiency of Sustainable Suppliers Based on Human and Environmental Indicators Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Gap Analysis (Case Study: Petrochemical Companies)

Authors

    Somayeh Karamad PhD Student, Department of Industrial Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran.
    Hassan Dehghan Dehnavi * Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran. hasanehghanehnavi@yahoo.com
    Hamid Babaei Meybodi Associate Professor, Department of Management, Meybod University, Meybod, Iran.
    Mojdeh Rabbani Assistant Professor, Department of Industrial Management, Yazd Branch, Islamic Azad University, Yazd, Iran.

Keywords:

efficiency, data envelopment analysis, human, environmental indicators, sustainable suppliers

Abstract

Evaluating the efficiency of sustainable suppliers not only raises awareness among stakeholders but also enhances competition, promotes industry dynamism, and fosters the sustainable and balanced development of society. In the present study, human and environmental indicators were utilized, and optimal input and output criteria were selected based on expert opinions. Therefore, the selection of variables (inputs and outputs) in this research was assessed through a review of similar studies, interviews, and surveys with experts and specialists. All calculations were performed using DEA Solver software. The results revealed that out of 13 companies, 12 were efficient (efficiency score equal to one), and only one company was inefficient. Furthermore, "Movaledan Chemical Company," with an efficiency score of 1.66, was found to be more efficient compared to other companies, almost twice as efficient as "Pars Pak Kimia Company," which had the lowest efficiency score of 0.858. Pars Pak Kimia Company, with the lowest efficiency score (0.858), ranked last. In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), when calculating the efficiency of companies, several efficient units were used as benchmarks (or references) for each inefficient company. The benchmarks for Pars Pak Kimia Company were "Iran Petrochemical Trading Company" with a lambda coefficient of 0.262, "Chelik Alborz Company" with a lambda coefficient of 0.55, "Movaledan Chemical Company" with a lambda coefficient of 0.052, and "Farzam Chemical Group" with a lambda coefficient of 0.135. The results of the paired T-test indicate a significant difference at the 95% confidence level between the scores of this variable in the current and target states.

References

E. Saygili, E. Uye Akcan, and Y. Ozturkoglu, "An Exploratory Analysis of Sustainability Indicators in Turkish Small-and Medium-Sized Industrial Enterprises," Sustainability, vol. 15, no. 3, p. 2063, 2023, doi: 10.3390/su15032063.

G. Xu, M. Yang, S. Li, M. Jiang, and H. Rehman, "Evaluating the effect of renewable energy investment on renewable energy development in China with panel threshold model," Energy Policy, vol. 187, p. 114029, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114029.

E. E. O. Opoku, A. O. Acheampong, K. E. Dogah, and I. Koomson, "Energy innovation investment and renewable energy in OECD countries," Energy Strategy Reviews, vol. 54, p. 101462, 2024, doi: 10.1016/j.esr.2024.101462.

H. Liu, "Life Cycle Assessment and Model Optimization for Sustainable Energy Cross-Border E-Commerce," Eai Endorsed Transactions on Energy Web, vol. 11, 2024, doi: 10.4108/ew.5493.

S. S. Coşkun, M. Kumru, and N. M. Kan, "An integrated framework for sustainable supplier development through supplier evaluation based on sustainability indicators," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 335, p. 130287, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.130287.

F. Alamroshan, M. La'li, and M. Yahyaei, "The green-agile supplier selection problem for the medical devices: a hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach," Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 6793-6811, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14690-z.

M. L. Tseng, S. X. Li, C. W. R. Lin, and A. S. Chiu, "Validating green building social sustainability indicators in China using the fuzzy delphi method," Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, vol. 40, no. 1, pp. 35-53, 2023, doi: 10.1080/21681015.2022.2070934.

F. A. De Lima and S. Seuring, "A Delphi study examining risk and uncertainty management in circular supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.108810.

M. L. Tseng, M. S. Islam, N. Karia, F. A. Fauzi, and S. Afrin, "A literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges," Resources, Conservation and Recycling, pp. 63-46, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009.

R. Wu, B. Huo, Y. Yu, and Z. Zhang, "Quality and green management for operational and environmental performance: relational capital in supply chain management," International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, pp. 1-22, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://come.tju.edu.cn/info/1632/7141.htm.

T. D. Mastos et al., "Introducing an application of an industry 4.0 solution for circular supply chain management," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 300, p. 126886, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126886.

A. Muñoz-Villamizar, J. Santos, P. Grau, and E. Viles, "Trends and gaps for integrating lean and green management in the agri-food sector," British Food Journal, 2019, doi: 10.1108/BFJ-06-2018-0359.

T. W. Chang, Y. L. Yeh, and H. X. Li, "How to shape an organization's sustainable green management performance: the mediation effect of environmental corporate social responsibility," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 21, p. 9198, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12219198.

S. Han, J. P. Ulhøi, and H. Song, "Digital trust in supply chain finance: the role of innovative fintech service provision," Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 2024, doi: 10.1108/JEIM-07-2022-0238.

G. Kabra and A. Ramesh, "Analyzing drivers and barriers of coordination in humanitarian supply chain management under fuzzy environment," Benchmarking: An International Journal, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 559-587, 2015, doi: 10.1108/BIJ-05-2014-0041.

M. Nishat Faisal, D. K. Banwet, and R. Shankar, "Supply chain risk mitigation: modeling the enablers," Business Process Management Journal, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 535-552, 2006, doi: 10.1108/14637150610678113.

O. Olawale, F. A. Ajayi, C. A. Udeh, and O. A. Odejide, "Risk management and HR practices in supply chains: Preparing for the Future," Magna Scientia Advanced Research and Reviews, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 238-255, 2024, doi: 10.30574/msarr.2024.10.2.0065.

H. Afshari, S. Agnihotri, C. Searcy, and M. Y. Jaber, "Social sustainability indicators: A comprehensive review with application in the energy sector," Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.spc.2022.02.018.

C. Xing, Y. Zhang, and Y. Wang, "Do banks value green management in China? The perspective of the green credit Policy," Finance Research Letters, vol. 35, p. 101601, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.frl.2020.101601.

C. W. Craighead, D. J. Ketchen Jr, and J. L. Darby, "Pandemics and supply chain management research: toward a theoretical toolbox," Decision Sciences, vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 838-866, 2020, doi: 10.1111/deci.12468.

J. Jemai, B. Do Chung, and B. Sarkar, "Environmental effect for a complex green supply-chain management to control waste: A sustainable approach," Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 277, p. 122919, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122919.

A. Tuni, A. Rentizelas, and D. Chinese, "An integrative approach to assess environmental and economic sustainability in multi-tier supply chains," Production Planning & Control, vol. 31, no. 11-12, pp. 861-882, 2020, doi: 10.1080/09537287.2019.1695922.

L. Pari, A. Suardi, W. Stefanoni, F. Latterini, and N. Palmieri, "Environmental and economic assessment of castor oil supply chain: a case study," Sustainability, vol. 12, no. 16, p. 6339, 2020, doi: 10.3390/su12166339.

K. Das, "Planning environmental and economic sustainability in closed-loop supply chains," Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 64-81, 2020, doi: 10.31387/oscm0400253.

I. Perevozova et al., "Integration of the supply chain management and development of the marketing system," International Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 496-507, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.coursesidekick.com/management/56685.

M. Mahmoudi and I. Parviziomran, "Reusable packaging in supply chains: A review of environmental and economic impacts, logistics system designs, and operations management," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 228, p. 107730, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107730.

Downloads

Published

2024-09-10

Submitted

2024-06-11

Revised

2024-08-13

Accepted

2024-08-24

How to Cite

Evaluating the Efficiency of Sustainable Suppliers Based on Human and Environmental Indicators Using Data Envelopment Analysis and Gap Analysis (Case Study: Petrochemical Companies). (2024). Management Strategies and Engineering Sciences, 6(2), 134-143. https://msesj.com/index.php/mses/article/view/85

Similar Articles

31-40 of 73

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.